(PS) Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Estate et al, No. 2:2015cv02448 - Document 29 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 11/16/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 20 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 16 Motion to Stay. (Michel, G.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL E. GONZALEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-2448 GEB GGH PS v. ORDER DEPARTMENT (BUREAU) OF REAL ESTATE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per and in forma pauperis. The matter was 18 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 12, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 25. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 12, 2016, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s “ex Parte application for a stay or temporary injunction on a pending state 4 action,” filed September 19, 2016, (ECF No. 16) is denied. 5 Dated: November 16, 2016 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
