(PC) Washington v. California Department of Corrections, No. 2:2015cv02302 - Document 25 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/23/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 9/22/16 (ECF No. 8 ), are ADOPTED IN FULL; Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 7 ) is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Washington v. California Department of Corrections Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:15-cv-2302-MCE-CMK-P ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District 20 of California local rules. 21 On September 22, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 23 within a specified time. ECF No. 8. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 24 been filed. 25 26 27 28 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 22, 2016 (ECF No. 8), are 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 7) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 23, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
