(PC) Hammler v. Haas, et al., No. 2:2015cv02266 - Document 54 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/5/2018 ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations in full. For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's 17 screening order, defendants Brown and Hudson, and the first and second causes of action of the operative 12 First Amended Complaint, are DISMISSED from this action without leave to amend. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(PC) Hammler v. Haas, et al. Doc. 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2266 JAM AC P v. ORDER HAAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 26, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 //// Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 29, 2018 (ECF No. 40), are adopted in 3 full. 4 2. For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s March 8, 2017 screening order (ECF 5 No. 17), defendants Brown and Hudson, and the first and second causes of action of the operative 6 First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12), are dismissed from this action without leave to amend. 7 8 9 10 DATED: June 5, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.