(PS) Rubang v. NAF-Human Resources, No. 2:2015cv02195 - Document 20 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/22/17 Recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice re 1 Notice of Removal filed by NAF-Human Resources. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to these Findings and Recommendations due within fourteen days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TEODORO G. RUBANG, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-2195 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NAF-HUMAN RESOURCES, Defendant. 16 17 18 By order filed March 10, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was 19 granted leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days from 20 the date of that order to file an amended complaint. The thirty-day period has expired, and 21 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 1 1 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 2 shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 3 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 4 District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Dated: May 22, 2017 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DLB:6 DB/orders/orders.pro se/rubang2195.fta.f&rs 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.