(PC) Jackson v. Bick et al, No. 2:2015cv02066 - Document 55 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/7/2018 ADOPTING 51 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 49 motion for injunctive relief. (York, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND D. JACKSON, Sr., 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2066 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. BICK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 51.) Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2018 (ECF No. 51), are adopted in full; and 1 1 2 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 49) is denied. Dated: May 7, 2018 3 4 5 15cv2066.inj.rel.800 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
