(PC) Jackson v. Bick et al, No. 2:2015cv02066 - Document 50 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/30/2018 ADOPTING 48 findings and recommendations. Defendant Seabrooks is DISMISSED from this action. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND D. JACKSON, Sr., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2066 DB P v. ORDER J. BICK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Defendant Seabrooks filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff does not oppose 20 21 the dismissal of defendant Seabrooks. (ECF No. 46 at 8.) By order dated March 19, 2018 the 22 magistrate judge recommended defendant Seabrooks’ motion to dismiss be granted. (ECF No. 23 48.) The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 19, 2018, are adopted; and 3 2. Defendant Seabrooks is dismissed from this action. 4 Dated: March 30, 2018 5 6 7 15cv2066.mtdJO.801CJRA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
