(PC) Houston v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Facility, et al., No. 2:2015cv02055 - Document 78 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/19/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed July 12, 2017, are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's motion to amend (ECF No. 59 ) is GRANTED with respect to the claims against defen dant Sacramento County that are consistent with those addressed in the pending summary judgment motion; plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED in all other respects; and Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 52 ) is GRANTED. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN LLOYD HOUSTON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-2055 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RIO CONSUMNES CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 12, 2017 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 12, 2017, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 59) is granted with respect to the claims against 4 defendant Sacramento County that are consistent with those addressed in the pending summary 5 judgment motion; plaintiff’s motion to amend is denied in all other respects; and 6 7 3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 52) is granted. Dated: December 19, 2017 8 9 10 11 /hous2055.805 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.