(HC) Robertson v. Schiegger, No. 2:2015cv01860 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/16/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case, and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGER WAYNE ROBERTSON, 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1860 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND JAMIE SCHIEGGER, et al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondents. 16 17 On September 4, 2015, petitioner was ordered to file a request to proceed in forma 18 pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. Petitioner was warned that failure to 19 comply with the court’s order would result in dismissal. The thirty day period has now expired 20 and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case, and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 23 without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 27 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 28 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 1 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: October 16, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 robe1860.fifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
