(PC) Weaver v. Sacramento County Main Jail, No. 2:2015cv01845 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/22/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Weaver v. Sacramento County Main Jail Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE WEAVER, 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1845-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN JAIL, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 11, 2015, the court found that plaintiff had failed to pay the $400 19 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 20 submit the affidavit and trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, 21 the court ordered plaintiff to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a) 22 within thirty days and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. 23 The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted an application 24 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 25 26 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 4 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 5 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 6 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 7 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 DATED: October 22, 2015. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
