(PC) Weaver v. Sacramento Police Department, No. 2:2015cv01832 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/21/16 RECOMMENDING that the case be dismissed for failure topay the required filing and administrative fees. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Weaver v. Sacramento Police Department Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE WEAVER, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-1832 GEB AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. 17 By order filed September 13, 2016, the District Judge adopted the findings and 18 recommendations filed June 27, 2016 (ECF No. 5), which recommended that plaintiff be barred 19 from seeking to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 9. As a result, plaintiff was ordered to pay 20 the required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $50.00 administrative fee within twenty-one days or 21 face dismissal of the complaint. Id. Twenty-one days have now passed and plaintiff has not paid 22 the required fees or otherwise responded to the order. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the case be dismissed for failure to 24 pay the required filing and administrative fees. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 4 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: October 21, 2016 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
