(PC) Jackson v. Galang et al, No. 2:2015cv01675 - Document 81 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 59 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/25/18. The motion to dismiss 33 filed by defendants Galang and Wolfson is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss 40 filed by the remaining defendants is DENIED in PART as to defendant Dator and GRANTED in PART as to all other defendants. This action shall proceed against defendant Dator only, who shall file an answer to the complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
(PC) Jackson v. Galang et al Doc. 81 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS VAUGHN JACKSON, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-CV-1675-JAM-CMK-P v. ORDER CARMELINO L. GALANG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. On September 7, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 proper analysis. 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 7, 2017, are adopted in 2. The motion to dismiss filed by defendants Galang and Wolfson (Doc. 33) 3. The motion to dismiss filed by the remaining defendants (Doc. 40) is 3 full; 4 5 6 7 8 9 is granted; denied in part as to defendant Dator and granted in part as to all other defendants; and 4. This action shall proceed against defendant Dator only, who shall file an answer to the complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. 10 11 12 13 DATED: April 25, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2