(PC) Hammler v. Wright, No. 2:2015cv01645 - Document 154 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/15/19 ADOPTING in full 152 findings and recommendations and DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 144 and 148 motions for order. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Hammler v. Wright Doc. 154 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-01645-TLN-EFB v. ORDER J. WRIGHT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 28, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 152.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 28, 2019, are adopted in full; and 27 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Plaintiff’s “Motions for Order” (ECF Nos. 144 & 148) are denied without prejudice. 2 3 Dated: August 15, 2019 4 5 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.