(PC) Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al., No. 2:2015cv01558 - Document 48 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/10/16 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/27/16 33 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS (ECF No. 17 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for damages under RLUIPA; Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS is DENIED in all other respects. Defendants shall file an answer to the complaint within twenty days of the date of this order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al. Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KASEY F. HOFFMAN, 12 13 14 15 No. 2: 15-cv-1558 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LASSEN ADULT DETENTION FACILITY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On May 27, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 27, 2016, are adopted in full; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17) is granted as to plaintiff’s claims for damages under RLUIPA; defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied in all other respects; 3 3. Defendants shall file an answer to the complaint within twenty days of the date of this 4 order. 5 DATED: August 10, 2016 6 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.