(PC) Hoffmann v. Jones, No. 2:2015cv01526 - Document 49 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/27/18 ADOPTING 46 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; and DENYING 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Hoffmann v. Jones Doc. 49 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KASEY F. HOFFMANN, 12 No. 2:15-cv-1526-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 KEVIN JONES, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 17, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2018, are adopted in full; and 27 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Defendant’s February 23, 2018 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 34) is denied. 2 3 4 5 DATED: September 27, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.