(PC) Griffin v. County of Yolo et al, No. 2:2015cv01491 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/1/2015 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEION GRIFFIN, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-1491 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF YOLO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed July 17, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a certified copy of his prison 18 trust account statement (in support of his application to proceed in forma pauperis) within thirty 19 days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 20 dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has neither responded to the 21 court’s order nor filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. Accordingly, IT IS 22 HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 26 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 27 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 28 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 1 1 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 2 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: September 1, 2015 4 5 /grif1491.fifp 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.