(PC)Ahmed v. Duffy et al, No. 2:2015cv01470 - Document 44 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/17 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/19/17 31 ADOPTED in full; Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 15 is DENIED; and Defendant is directed to file and serve an answer to the First Amended Complaint within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Ahmed v. Duffy et al Doc. 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAIYEZ AHMED, 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1470 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BRIAN DUFFY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 19, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 31. Neither party 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 19, 2017, are adopted in full; 28 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss , ECF No. 15, is denied; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. Defendant is directed to file and serve an answer to the First Amended Complaint 2 within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order. 3 DATED: September 28, 2017 4 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
