(PC) Paige v. Robert Woods Hospital, No. 2:2015cv01453 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/25/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY WAYNE PAIGE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1453 JAM CKD P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT WOODS HOSPITAL, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On July 14, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application 18 or pay the $400 filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result 19 in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 20 plaintiff has not filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, nor paid the $400 21 filing fee.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 23 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 28 1 Plaintiff paid $5.00 on July 24, 2015. 1 1 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 4 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Dated: August 25, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 paig1453.fifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
