(PC) Bozeman v. California Health Care Facility, No. 2:2015cv01408 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/8/2015 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVE BOZEMAN, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-1408 JAM DAD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE FACILITY, Defendant. 17 18 By an order filed July 20, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to either file an in forma pauperis 19 affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do 20 so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now 21 expired. Plaintiff has neither filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, nor paid the appropriate filing 22 fees, nor otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 23 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 1 1 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 2 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 3 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: September 8, 2015 5 6 7 DAD:10 boze1408.fifp 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.