(PC) Hoffmann v. Lassen County, et al., No. 2:2015cv01382 - Document 81 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/20/19 ADOPTING 78 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; DENYING 63 Motion for Attorneys' Fees; DENYING 73 Motion for Sanctions. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KASEY F. HOFFMANN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1382 GEB DB P v. ORDER LASSEN COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 7, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 24 25 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 27 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 28 ///// 1 1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 7, 2019 (ECF No. 78) are adopted in full; 6 2. Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees (ECF No. 63) is denied; and 7 3. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 73) is denied. 8 Dated: September 20, 2019 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
