(PC)Daniels v. Fox et al, No. 2:2015cv01264 - Document 40 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/28/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 23 25 26 Motions for Extraordinary Relief are DENIED. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZACHARIAH DANIELS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 15-cv-1264 GEB AC P v. ORDER R. FOX, Warden, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 17 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 29, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 31. Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2016, are adopted in full; and 27 28 //// 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s motions for extraordinary relief, ECF Nos. 23, 25, and 26 are denied. 2 DATED: 3 Dated: December 28, 2016 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.