(PC) Hobley v. Baker et al, No. 2:2015cv01260 - Document 81 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/30/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON DURELL HOBLEY, 12 No. 2:15-cv-1260 MCE CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 E. BAKER, et al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. There are two pending motions for summary judgment. On March 21, 2018, 19 plaintiff was ordered to file oppositions or statements of non-opposition within thirty days. In the 20 same order, plaintiff was informed that failure to file oppositions would result in a 21 recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The thirty day 22 period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 23 The court notes that the court’s March 21, 2018 order was returned to the court by the 24 U.S. Postal Service. Plaintiff was properly served as it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the 25 court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of 26 documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 27 28 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 6 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 7 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 8 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: April 30, 2018 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 hob1260.46frs 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.