(HC) Androshchuk v. Biter, No. 2:2015cv01204 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/14/17. Petitioner's 17 motion for stay is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Androshchuk v. Biter Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 EDUARD VLADIMIROV ANDROSHCHUK, Petitioner, 13 ORDER v. 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-1204 MCE AC P MARTIN BITER, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 18, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 20. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 18, 2016 (ECF No. 20), are 3 4 ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Petitioner’s motion for stay (ECF No. 17) is DENIED. 5 6 Dated: March 14, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
