(PC) Rankins v. Liu et al, No. 2:2015cv01164 - Document 48 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 45 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/19/18. Defendant's 45 motion to dismiss is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Rankins v. Liu et al Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-01164 KJM DB P NORMAN RANKINS, v. ORDER ALEXANDER LIU, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, Norman Rankins, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 18 an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 31, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court 26 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 31, 2017, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 45) is denied. 4 DATED: March 19, 2018. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
