(PC) Anderson v. Meier, et al, No. 2:2015cv01148 - Document 152 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/23/2022 ADOPTING 150 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 149 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk of the Court is directed send a courtesy copy of 151 Objections to Carmen E. Bremer. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
(PC) Anderson v. Meier, et al Doc. 152 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC ZACHARY ANDERSON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-01148-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TIM VIRGA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. The court writes separately to clarify that the dismissal of this action pursuant to the 28 settlement agreement reached between the parties precludes the court from granting plaintiff any 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 further relief in this action. The court makes no findings as to whether any of the contentions 2 raised in plaintiff’s objections might support one or more cognizable claims for relief in a new 3 civil rights action. In addition, good cause appearing, the court will direct the Clerk of the Court 4 to send a courtesy copy of plaintiff’s objections to counsel for the plaintiff class in Ashker v. 5 Newsom, Case No. 4:09-05796 CW (N.D. Cal.). 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 19, 2021, are adopted in full; 8 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 149) is denied; and 9 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed send a courtesy copy of plaintiff’s objections, ECF 10 No. 151, to Carmen E. Bremer, Esq., Bremer Law Group PLLC, 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 11 2100, Seattle, WA 98101. 12 DATED: May 23, 2022. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.