(PC) Russi v. Vang, No. 2:2015cv01130 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/21/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALFREDO RUSSI, 12 No. 2:15-cv-1130 KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 T. VANG, et al., 15 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed June 2, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit 18 and a certified trust account statement within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so 19 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now 20 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a completed in 21 forma pauperis affidavit on the form used by this district or a certified trust account statement. 22 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 24 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 28 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 1 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 2 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 3 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 4 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Dated: July 21, 2015 6 7 /russ1130.fifp 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.