(PC) Howell v. Andrichak et al, No. 2:2015cv00792 - Document 52 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 47 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/3/2018; Plaintiff's 43 Motion to Reinstate his case is DENIED. (Fabillaran, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREEM J. HOWELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-0792 WBS KJN P v. ORDER L. ANDRICHAK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 28, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations.1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 27 28 1 On May 1, 2018, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file objections. However, on June 5, 2018, plaintiff filed a notice that he declines to file objections, and will be pursing his claims in state court. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 28, 2018, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate his case (ECF No. 43) is denied. 4 5 Dated: July 3, 2018 6 7 8 /howe0792.801 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.