(PS) Murphy, et al. v. JP Morgan Chase, et al., No. 2:2015cv00725 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/18/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
(PS) Murphy, et al. v. JP Morgan Chase, et al. Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 TONYA MURPHY and SAMUEL SMITH, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. JP MORGAN CHASE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 No. 2:15-cv-0725 KJM GGH PS By order filed May 11, 2015, plaintiffs’ amended complaint was dismissed and twenty- 18 eight days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court 19 informed plaintiffs of the deficiencies in their amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period 20 has now expired, and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to 21 the court’s order. 22 Plaintiffs have apparently decided to rest on the dismissed amended complaint. For the 23 reasons given in the May 11, 2015 order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 24 dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 2 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 3 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: June 18, 2015 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 GGH:076/Murphy0725.fta 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.