(PS) U.S. Bank National Association v. Banks et al, No. 2:2015cv00644 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 06/02/15 and ORDERING this matter be REMANDED to San Joaquin County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
Download PDF
(PS) U.S. Bank National Association v. Banks et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-0644 TLN DAD PS v. ORDER JEROME BANKS; ROBERTA BANKS, 15 Defendants. 16 By Notice of Removal filed March 23, 2015, this unlawful detainer action was removed 17 18 from the San Joaquin County Superior Court. Defendants are proceeding pro se with the above- 19 entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local 20 Rule 302(c)(21). On April 17, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 22 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 23 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 24 recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the 25 findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 27 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 17, 2015 (ECF No. 8) are 3 adopted in full; 4 2. This action is summarily remanded to the San Joaquin County Superior Court; 5 and 6 3. This case is closed. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: June 2, 2015 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 /USbank0644.jo 28 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.