(PS) (SS) Eldridge v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2015cv00595 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/8/15 ORDERING that this case is randomly assigned to U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez and U.S. Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings . IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this case be dismisssed for failure to prosecute and the Clerk be directed to close the case. This Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) (SS) Eldridge v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KOKAYI ELDRIDGE, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-595-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 18 On August 26, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to comply with its March 25, 2015 order 19 within 14 days. ECF No. 6. The court warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order 20 might result in the dismissal of the case. The allotted time has passed and plaintiff has failed to 21 comply with the March 25, 2015 order or otherwise respond. 22 23 24 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. It is further RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute and the Clerk be directed to close the case. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 3 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 4 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: October 8, 2015. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
