(PS) Harrell v. Belyea, No. 2:2015cv00576 - Document 92 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/29/18 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/1/18 67 are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's leave to amend 56 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Harrell v. Belyea Doc. 92 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL, 6 7 8 No. 2:15-cv-00576 JAM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHELLE BELYEA, 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On May 1, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 14 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 15 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF 67. Plaintiff has filed 16 objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 82. Defendant opposed the 17 objections. ECF No. 84. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 1, 2018, are adopted in full; and 22 2. Plaintiff’s leave to amend, ECF No. 56, is denied. 23 24 25 DATED: August 29, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
