(PS) Sexton v. State of California, No. 2:2015cv00542 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 10 the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 10/30/15. Plaintiff's 9 amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICIA D. SEXTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-0542 GEB AC v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceed in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States 17 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On September 23, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 11. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 23 24 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 25 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 26 analysis. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 23, 2015, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 9, is dismissed without leave to amend. 4 Dated: October 30, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
