Johnson v. Sammy's Restaurant, Inc., No. 2:2015cv00147 - Document 69 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 67 Findings and Recommendations in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/04/23 DENYING 62 Motion for Default Judgment, DISMISSING Plaintiff's claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act and DECLINING to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
Johnson v. Sammy's Restaurant, Inc. Doc. 69 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-147-TLN-KJN ORDER v. SAMMY”S RESTAURANT, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 On October 31, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17 18 67), which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On November 7, 2023, 20 Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 68), which the Court 21 reviewed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 22 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 25 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 67) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 62) is DENIED; 4 3. Plaintiff’s claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act is DISMISSED as 5 6 7 8 9 moot; 4. The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims; and 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Date: December 4, 2023 10 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.