(PC) Canada v. Hamkar, No. 2:2014cv02990 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 06/07/16 adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief 17 is denied. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 No. 2:14-cv-2990 WBS KJN P RONALD LEE CANADA, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. HAMKAR, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 28, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 28, 2016, are adopted in full; and 28 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 17) is denied. 1 1 Dated: June 7, 2016 2 3 4 Cana2990.801 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
