MyECheck, Inc. v. Seven Miles Securities et al, No. 2:2014cv02889 - Document 53 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/2/16: Plaintiff's motions for default judgment, ECF Nos. 39, 44, are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
MyECheck, Inc. v. Seven Miles Securities et al Doc. 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MYECHECK, INC., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-02889 KJM-AC v. ORDER TITAN INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 On March 31, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations applicable 17 18 to this case which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 19 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 20 52. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 21 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 22 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 23 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 24 the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 25 the proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 31, 2016, are adopted in full; 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 2. Plaintiff’s motions for default judgment, ECF Nos. 39, 44, are denied without prejudice; and 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies discussed in the findings and recommendations. DATED: June 2, 2016 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.