(PC) Green v. CDCR et al, No. 2:2014cv02854 - Document 55 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/28/18 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/22/18 51 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants' Motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status, 39 , is DENIED; and Plaintiff is permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Green v. CDCR et al Doc. 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WARREN C. GREEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2854-TLN-AC v. ORDER CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 22, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 51.) Plaintiff and 23 defendants have filed their respective objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 22, 2018 are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, (ECF No. 39), is 4 denied; and 5 3. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: August 28, 2018 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.