(PC) Jackson v. Singh et al, No. 2:2014cv02809 - Document 42 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/13/18 ADOPTING 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's December 11, 2017 motion for stay 32 is DENIED without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jackson v. Singh et al Doc. 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND D. JACKSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-02809-TLN-EFB P v. ORDER SINGH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 30, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 39.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 30, 2018 (ECF No. 39), are adopted in full; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. Plaintiff’s December 11, 2017 motion for stay (ECF No. 32) is DENIED without prejudice. 3 4 Dated: June 13, 2018 5 6 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
