(PS) Reyes v. Radcliff, No. 2:2014cv02742 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/30/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Matter referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Reyes v. Radcliff Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICTORIA L. REYES, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2742 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RADCLIFF, BADGE # 224, 15 Defendants. 16 17 On June 23, 2015, the court granted the pro se plaintiff’s application to proceed forma 18 pauperis. ECF No. 3. The court’s order dismissed the complaint because it failed to allege any 19 actionable conduct by defendant. Plaintiff was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint, if 20 she chose to do so. The order cautioned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in 21 a recommendation to dismiss this action. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, nor 22 responded to the court’s order in any way. 23 24 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 2 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 3 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: September 30, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.