(PS) Maxey v. Brown, et al, No. 2:2014cv02507 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/27/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 8 Findings and Recommendations; all claims against defendants, except those against defendant Scott Jones, as set forth in Part II and III of the findings and recommend ations - that is, the Section 1983 Fourth Amendment claims, and the state law intentional infliction of emotional distress claims - are DISMISSED with prejudice. Robert M. Maxey, Jan Scully (Sacramento County District Attorney), Patricia Staines, Edmund G. Brown (Governor) and Kamala Harris (Attorney General) terminated.(Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Maxey v. Brown, et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES C. MAXEY, 12 13 No. 2:14-cv-2507 MCE AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER 14 EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 24, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 8. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 24, 2015 (ECF No. 8), are adopted in full; and 2. All claims against defendants, except those against defendant Scott Jones, as set forth 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 in Part II and III of the findings and recommendations – that is, the Section 1983 Fourth 2 Amendment claims, and the state-law intentional infliction of emotional distress claims – are 3 DISMISSED with prejudice. 4 Dated: March 27, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.