(PS) Smith, III v. Office of Child Support Enforcement, No. 2:2014cv02444 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/12/15: The findings and recommendations 3 are adopted in full. Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP 2 is denied. Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. This action is dismissed. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PS) Smith, III v. Office of Child Support Enforcement Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORNELL J S SMITH III, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:14-cv-2444 JAM DAD PS ORDER OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, 16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 18 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On April 28, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 23 recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any objections 24 to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 28, 2015 (Dkt. No. 3) are adopted in full; 4 5 2. Plaintiff’s October 17, 2014 application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) is denied; 6 7 3. Plaintiff’s October 17, 2014 complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is dismissed without leave to amend; and 8 9 4. This action is dismissed. DATED: June 12, 2015 10 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________________ 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /smith2444.jo 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.