(PS) Frey v. Smithey et al, No. 2:2014cv02317 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/5/14: This action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Stanislaus, Modesto Division. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Frey v. Smithey et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAN FREY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2317 TLN CKD PS v. ORDER MARK SMITHEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Defendants, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action from state court. The 17 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 8, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 20 which were served on Defendants and which contained notice to Defendants that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 8, 2014, are adopted in full; and 26 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Stanislaus, Modesto Division. 3 4 Dated: November 5, 2014 5 6 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
