(HC) Jackson v. Biter, No. 2:2014cv02268 - Document 76 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/06/21 ADOPTING 75 Findings and Recommendations in full GRANTING 72 Motion to Stay pending appeal. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RACARDO JACKSON, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2268 MCE DB P v. ORDER WARDEN, CSP-SOLANO, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ of 17 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to both parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 75.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 27, 2021 (ECF No. 75), are adopted 3 in full; and 4 2. Respondent’s motion for stay pending appeal (ECF No. 72) is granted. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: December 6, 2021 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
