(PC) Ennis v. Hayes et al, No. 2:2014cv02171 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/22/17: The findings and recommendations filed December 28, 2016, are adopted in full and this action is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Ennis v. Hayes et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JOSEPH L. ENNIS, 7 No. 2:14-cv-2171 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 J. HAYES, et al., 10 ORDER Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 13 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 14 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 15 On December 28, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 16 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 17 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 18 objections to the findings and recommendations. 19 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 20 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that: 22 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 28, 2016, are adopted in full; and 23 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 DATED: March 22, 2017 25 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________________ 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
