(PC)Walker v. Whiting et al, No. 2:2014cv02064 - Document 52 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/14/15 ORDERING that this action is dismissed against defendants Whiting, Blanco, Johns and Bilgera with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a). All parties are to b ear their own costs and attorney's fees. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Lee, and this case closed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) Modified on 9/15/2015 (Plummer, M).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN WALKER, 12 No. 2:14-cv-2064 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 WHITING, et al., 15 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 On August 17, 2015, plaintiff and defendants Whiting, Blanco, Johns, and Bilgera 18 stipulated that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement. (ECF 19 No. 50; see ECF No. 49.) On August 20, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to notify the court within fourteen days 20 21 whether he also intended to dismiss this action as to defendant Lee, who had not yet been served 22 with the complaint. (ECF No. 51; see ECF No. 45.) As plaintiff has not timely responded, the 23 undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed as to Lee pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 41(b). 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed against defendants 26 Whiting, Blanco, Johns, and Bilgera with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). All parties 27 are to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 28 //// 1 1 2 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Lee, and this case closed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that 8 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 9 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: September 14, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 2 / walk2064.59c 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.