(PC) Dicey v. Hanks et al, No. 2:2014cv02018 - Document 34 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/2015 ORDERING that the 29 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Defendant Statti's 15 motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the claims against defendant Statti are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(PC) Dicey v. Hanks et al Doc. 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERLAN LYNELL DICEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2018 JAM AC P v. ORDER W. HANKS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 14, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 29. 23 Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations1 (ECF No. 32) and defendant 24 Statti has responded (ECF No. 33). In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 26 27 28 1 Although not filed by the Clerk of the Court until September 25, 2015, plaintiff’s certificate of service reflects that the objections were submitted to prison officials for mailing on September 3, 2015. ECF No. 32 at 29. Under the prison mailbox rule, plaintiff’s objections are timely. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 2 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 3 analysis. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 14, 2015 (ECF No. 29), are adopted in 6 7 full; and 2. Defendant Statti’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is granted and the claims against 8 defendant Statti are dismissed with prejudice. 9 DATED: October 15, 2015 10 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.