(PC) Williams v. California Department of Corrections et al, No. 2:2014cv01951 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/16/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEREK WILLIAMS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2: 14-cv-1951 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and 20 returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 21 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address 22 change. 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 1 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 2 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 3 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 4 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Dated: January 16, 2015 6 7 8 9 Will1951.33 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.