(PS) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Warner et al, No. 2:2014cv01574 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/29/14 RECOMMENDING that this matter be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California,County of Shasta; and Plaintiff's ex parte application for an order shortening time be denied as unnecessary. Matter referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Warner et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1574-TLN-CMK vs. ORDER WILLIAM W. WARNER, et al., 15 Defendants. / 16 17 This action was removed to this court from the Shasta County Superior Court by 18 the defendants, proceeding in propria persona. This matter is set for an initial scheduling 19 conference on November 5, 2014, before the undersigned in Redding, California. 20 The undersigned has issued findings and recommendations for this action to be 21 remanded back to state court. The court therefore finds it appropriate to vacate the scheduling 22 conference until the pending findings and recommendations have been ruled on. Once the issue 23 of jurisdiction has been resolved, the court will reset a scheduling conference in this matter if 24 appropriate. 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling conference set for 2 November 5, 2014, is vacated, to be reset following final resolution of the pending findings and 3 recommendations, if appropriate. 4 5 6 7 DATED: October 29, 2014 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.