(PS) Graves v. Jones, No. 2:2014cv01476 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/3/2014 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PETER GRAVES, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-1476 TLN DAD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT JONES, Defendant. 16 17 By order signed October 20, 2014, plaintiff’s pro se complaint was dismissed and leave 18 was granted to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. Plaintiff was 19 granted twenty-eight days from the date of the order to file an amended complaint and was 20 cautioned that failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner may result in a 21 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight day period has expired, and 22 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 23 24 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate 1 1 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within 2 the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 3 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: December 3, 2014 5 6 7 8 DAD:6 Ddad1\orders.pro se\graves1476.fta.f&rs.docx 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.