(BK) Burkart v. Patel, No. 2:2014cv01204 - Document 2 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/10/2014 ORDERING that the Bankruptcy Court's 1 findings and recommendations, filed 5/15/2014, are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, (Adv. Pro. No. 12-2454, ECF No. 41), is GRANTED. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant in the amount of $27,800.00. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 10 11 In re VINCENT THAKUR SINGH, dba PERFECT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., dba AAMCO STOCKTON, INC., dba AAMCO ORANGEVALE, INC., fdba ACCEPTANCE CAPITAL, fdba PERFECT MORTGAGE and MALANIE GAY SINGH, Debtors, 12 17 18 19 BK Case No. 10-42050-D-7 Adv. Proc. No. 12-2454 MICHAEL F. BURKART, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, 15 16 2:14-cv-01204-GEB (BK) ORDER ADOPTING THE BANKRUPTCY JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 13 14 No. Plaintiff, v. ZIGGNASHA PATEL aka ZIGNASHA PATEL, Defendant. 20 21 22 On August 14, 2012, Chapter 7 Trustee Michael Burkart 23 (“Plaintiff”) 24 Avoidance and Recovery of Fraudulent Transfer against Defendant 25 Ziggnasha Patel aka Zignasha Patel (“Defendant”). (Adv. Pro. No. 26 12-2454, ECF No. 1.) Defendant failed to appear in the referenced 27 adversary proceeding and default was entered on May 13, 2014. filed in the Bankruptcy 28 1 Court a Complaint for 1 (Adv. Pro. No. 12-2454, ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff subsequently filed 2 a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, (Adv. Pro. No. 12-2454, 3 ECF No. 41), which was unopposed. 4 On May 15, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court filed findings 5 and recommendations on the default motion for this Court’s review 6 pursuant to In re Bellingham Ins. Agency, Inc., 702 F.3d 553, 7 565-66 (9th Cir. 2012), aff’d, Exec. Benefits Ins. Agency v. 8 Arkison, --- S. Ct. ----, 2014 WL 2560461 (2014). No objections 9 to the findings and recommendations were filed. 10 In accordance with Executive Benefits Ins. Agency, 2014 11 WL 2560461, at *4 this Court has conducted a de novo review of 12 the 13 supported by the record and by proper analysis. 14 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 15 1) 16 matter finds The the findings Bankruptcy and recommendations Court’s findings to be and recommendations filed May 15, 2014, are adopted in full; 17 18 and 2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, (Adv. Pro. No. 12-2454, ECF No. 41), is GRANTED; 19 3) Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff 20 against Defendant in the amount of $27,800.00. 21 Dated: June 10, 2014 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.