(PC) Pimentel v. Beard, et al., No. 2:2014cv01192 - Document 62 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/15/18 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 1/11/18 61 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and Plaintiff's Motion for a Stay 60 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Pimentel v. Beard, et al. Doc. 62 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICARDO PIMENTEL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1192 MCE DB P v. ORDER JEFFREY BEARD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 11, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 61. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 11, 2018 (ECF No. 61) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a stay (ECF No. 60) is DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED.\ 5 Dated: February 15, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
