(PS) Giddens v. City of Suisun et al, No. 2:2014cv00943 - Document 115 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/27/18 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 2/5/18 112 are ADOPTED in full; Public Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 107 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follo ws: (a) GRANTED as to Claims One (Fourth Amendment Unlawful Arrest), Four (First Amendment), Seven (Monell), Ten (False Arrest/False Imprisonment), and Fifteen (Unruh Civil Rights Act); (b) DENIED as to Claims Two (Fourth Amendment Excessive Force ), Nine (Assault and Battery), Thirteen (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress), and Fourteen (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress) against Defendants Mattos and Urlaub; and The following Defendants Dadisho, White, Sanchez, Day, Hudson, the City of Suisun, the Suisun City Council, and the Suisun City Police Department are TERMINATED from this case. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
(PS) Giddens v. City of Suisun et al Doc. 115 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD GIDDENS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-00943-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SUISUN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 112.) 22 Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 113.) Defendants 23 the City of Suisun, the Suisun City Council, Mayor Pedro Sanchez, City Council Members Jane 24 Day and Mike Hudson, the Suisun City Police Department, Police Chief Edmond Dadisho, 25 Commander Tim Mattos, Sergeant Andrew White, and Officer Michael Urlaub (the “Public 26 Defendants”) filed a response. (ECF No. 114.) 27 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 5, 2018 (ECF No. 112), are adopted 5 6 7 8 9 10 in full; and 2. Public Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 107) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: (a) GRANTED as to Claims One (Fourth Amendment Unlawful Arrest), Four (First Amendment), Seven (Monell), Ten (False Arrest/False Imprisonment), and Fifteen (Unruh Civil Rights Act); 11 (b) DENIED as to Claims Two (Fourth Amendment Excessive Force), Nine 12 (Assault and Battery), Thirteen (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress), and Fourteen 13 (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress) against Defendants Mattos and Urlaub; and 14 15 3. The following Defendants Dadisho, White, Sanchez, Day, Hudson, the City of Suisun, the Suisun City Council, and the Suisun City Police Department are terminated from this case. 16 17 Dated: March 27, 2018 18 19 20 21 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2